Posts Tagged ‘NFL’

Brian Cushing Revisited

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

Before I start getting into “my point” I’m going to ahead and assume we are all on the same page regarding the facts, if not head over to ESPN and read the official report on Cushing.  Now with that out of the way let’s get down to business.

So Cushing kept his Rookie of the Year award after some mindless “re-vote” by AP writers (who might be the most self-absorbed group of people I’ve ever had the pleasure of not meeting).  People keep bringing up the issue of steroids in sports and cheating, when I consider even the juxtaposition of the words to be unfair.

First, in the NFL it is an unwritten rule that some players are on the juice.  With careers as short as they are and job security non existent, can you blame them?  The NFL has created an environment conducive to drug use, plain and simple.  But that’s hardly my reasoning of why I think it’s okay. I’ll pause for your gasp as you run for the moral high ground from which to spit on me.

I’m a realist, I played the sport.  I was at a major college program and my brief stint in some form of professional football was a  fraction of a taste of the life NFL players live.  The constant media bubble, a virtual fishbowl of analysis.  Don’t believe me? Turn on ESPN for an entire day, even as background noise you realize it’s over kill.  The NFL is a behemoth of media, societal, and economic clout, as goes the NFL so goes the nation.  The millions of dollars in advertising and other revenue streams generated by teams pale in comparison to the sports books and NFL Lines you can access 24/7.  It is the Truman Show off sports, players can’t escape and fans can always tune in.

My point is this, the hoopla around the NFL has made it profitable, but it also means players must be faster, stronger, bigger.  It means better runs, longer passes, more amazing catches, and of course bone crushing hits.  While I don’t know who took what or when, I know I don’t care.  And we as fans and a public are fooling ourselves if we think players aren’t juicing, but even worse if we condemn them for doing so.

It’s time to get our heads on straight and wake the hell up.  Welcome to real life (now go ahead and climb down from that mountain top).

This is Bigger then Ben

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

Jay: Yesterday the much anticipated meeting between Ben Roethlisberger and Roger Goodell took place. The two met for over 2 hours. Most people have their own opinion on how Big Ben should be disciplined, should or shouldn’t he be suspended? I have a hard time agreeing with people that think he should be suspended. He didn’t commit a crime and legally he wasn’t convicted of anything. Now morally? We may have issues but that is for each person to decide. The only problem for Big Ben?… I’m not he Czar of the NFL and I don’t make those decisions (many think I should but that’s for a different day). I’m guessing that Ben will be suspended for somewhere between 2 and 4 games and then will get it shortened to a game. For a closer look at how this will affect the Steelers and their franchise I’ll turn it over to Will, whose man crush for Big Ben is borderline obsessive, once telling me that he wished he was involved with him in a bathroom stall… I’m guessing if wouldn’t be too hard to get Ben to agree to that…

Will: Jay my friend, clearly you do not comprehend the gravity of this situation. Yes, I would love to father Ben’s throat babies and unless the Steelers schedule has them playing the Bucs, Browns, and Bills in the first three weeks they will tank without Ben, but that’s not the point. The point is that this suspension could be the most significant turning point in NFL player/league relations since the changing free-agency rules in 1995. Here’s why;  

Big Ben will most likely be suspended under the Player Conduct Policy by-laws involving behavior deemed “detrimental to the league”. Believe it or not, the focus of my college studies was contractual law and criminal justice (I wrote all of my papers on the NFLPA and anti-trust suits against the league…obsessed is a dirty word but I guess if the helmet fits…), and the wording of this section is so convoluted and ambiguous, that it gives ultimate authoritative power to the commissioner to basically do whatever the hell he wants. Roger Goodell’s decision as to how long he will suspend Big Ben will now quantify “how embarrassing” his actions were as well as setting a precedent for measuring a player’s stature in relationship to suspension length, even though Ben has never been charged with or even arrested for committing any crime. And don’t think for one second that NFLPA Execuative Director DeMaurice “D” Smith isn’t loading this bullet into his CBA negotiating chamber as another one of his union members loses money (Ben’s contract with incentives averages out to about $1.9 million per game) without criminal charges being filed.  

The significant elements in this whole thing are Ben’s stature as an elite player, face of a storied franchise, and as a quarterback. Many feel that if QB’s have special treatment on the field (take off the skirt Brady), they should have a higher standard of conduct off of it. Brandon Marshall beat the hell out of his girlfriend, and got one game because charges were never filed. Big Ben was not suspended for the situation with the gold digger in Nevada, because he adamantly denied the charges and it was a clear case of extortion. Ben’s actions in GA were clearly inappropriate and embarrassing to the league and the Steelers (not wrong, not illegal, just embarrassing), and the fact that he admittedly understood what he did was not the way a franchise QB should act, put the final seal on his guilt in the perception of the league. 

So here’s the $108 million dollar question; should Ben be punished more severely because he is who he is, or should the punishment fit the crime, which in this case would be nothing? Because Ben had his legal representation present in the meeting as well as his agent, I believe that Goodell is going to slap a four gamer on him and allow him to appeal it down to one to two games. Four games will never stick because of the amount of money Ben will lose and the clear case Ben would have if he wanted to file a lawsuit for lost wages. Ben did not break any laws, but the league needs to send a message. Chances are it will be two games; one imposed by the league, and one imposed by the Steelers so both parties can save face and impress their authority.  

This suspension will set precedents for quantifying league embarrassment and player stature regardless of legal responsibility, as well as fuel serious power changes with the next CBA because of Roger Goodell’s personal take on his duty to “defend the shield.” As I said earlier, this is one of the most important moments in the modern era of the NFL and everyone is on edge waiting to see how hard Goodell’s hammer will fall.

Favre gets burned again…

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

Yesterday the League voted to change its overtime rules for the playoffs. The old rules, which I prefer, first team to score wins. Now:

-There will still be a coin toss to establish possession 

-If the team with the first possession scores a touchdown or the opposing team scores a defensive touch down, the game is over. If they kick a field goal, they will kick off to the opposing team, who will get a chance to tie or win the game

-If the opposing team responds with a field goal, they then kick off and sudden death format resumes. If they score a touchdown, do not kick a field goal, or if the team with first possession scores a defensive touchdown, the game is over.

Did you follow all of that FWGNFL Nation? I have a better solution NFL teams. If you want to win the game…DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT! You get 60 minutes in regulation of “fair” play. If you can’t beat a team in 60 minutes then maybe you don’t deserve to win? Last year, 53.8% of the teams that won the toss went on to win the game. Hmm…Seems pretty close to 50/50 to me? There is nothing wrong with OT the way it is and there is no need to change anything about it right now…

How about Minnesota voting to keep the rules the same? Their game vs. New Orleans last year is the main reason that this rule change came about and they were the ones burned by it. The one wish I have is that the Vikings get burned by this rule again…Picture it now, they will be the team in the Super Bowl who wins the toss and kicks a FG. Game over? I think not. With the new rule change, the other team gets a shot to score. On the ensuing kickoff the AFC team returns if for a TD. Game over, Favre career over…Well maybe not, but the Vikings get burned for the second year in a row

Will’s Take

What the league is saying is that teams should not have to count on their defense to stop their opponents from picking up 4 first downs, or about 45 yards, with the game on the line. This concept is also based on the assumption that a 35 yard field goal is a gimme; that is re-god-damn-diculous. The talent pool for kickers is extremely shallow, especially outside of 30 yards, and if you add the fact that 6 or the 8 wild-card round teams last year played in outdoor stadiums, a 35 yard boot in a playoff game is anything but a guarantee.  

The idea is to have the best team win, not the best offense. This rule change is a slap in the face to every team that still believes that defense is what wins championships. Sorry Pittsburgh, but your 6 Super Bowls won behind some of the best defensive teams ever assembled are less “entertaining” then watching Tom Brady toss the ball around the yard while his defense eats crayons on the back of the short bus.  

If you want to change rules, how about taking the skirts off of quarterbacks in this league or maybe figuring out a way to let corners breath on receivers down the field without getting tagged with a PI. Overtime aint broke; you didn’t need to fix it.

(Trying to) Break down the Colts and Saints…

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

Colts Vs Saints Super Bowl 2010

What to expect when the Colts have the ball.

I think the key for Peyton Manning and the Colts offense is simple…DON’T TURN THE BALL OVER. Stupid? I know. Of course if you don’t turn it over you’re in much better shape. Here is my logic: The Saints defense is ranked 25th in the NFL (that is pretty brutal) but they are so “turnover” optimistic. They force so many turnovers and that really negates them being a below average defense. If Peyton can be smart with the ball and not turn it over, I expect the Colts to control the clock. They still may throw it 45 times but short, smart, low risk passes. Look for Peyton to try and not force it anywhere. I expect him to be looking to Dallas Clark in the middle. Darren Sharper will gamble and try and make a few plays but if Manning can bait him into a stupid decision look for Garcon to make a few big plays down the sideline. It doesn’t matter who the Colts plug in because Manning is so good he raises the level of play of all the guys around him.

 You should expect Greg Williams to throw everything including the kitchen sink at Manning. He has publicly stated that he is going to try to hit him so much that he won’t be able to get up. I think the Saints need to get pressure on Manning and force him into quick throws. I expect the Saints to blitz a lot to try to confuse Manning. Will it work? Probably not but its better than letting him sit back there with a ton of time. (The Jets blitz more than any other team in the NFL and that didn’t seem to go so well)

 What to expect when the Saints have the ball.

I think a lot depends on the health of Dwight Freeney. First off, if he doesn’t play that is a huge blow because he is one of the best pass rushers of the last 5 years. Second, it will really negate Robert Mathis, who usually plays opposite of Freeney. Mathis is also a very good defensive end but if Freeney can’t play, New Orleans will be able to send extra help his way so its really like they are taking both players away. Also, instead of having to keep another blocker in for Freeney, the Saints can send another weapon into a pass route. Drew Brees loves to throw the ball down the field. He is a very aggressive QB and if Freeney doesn’t play, conventional wisdom says that he will have much more time in the pocket to allow his wide receivers to get down field. I really think the Saints will try to get Reggie Bush involved. Maybe in the screen game but maybe just as a decoy. He is so dangerous in space and when he gets the ball in his hands with room to work, he is as explosive as anyone in the NFL (as seen when he returns punts). The Colts will need to know where he is when he is on the field. I think the Saints may sneak him out to one side and then throw back to a WR or another RB on the other side of the field. Brees has so many weapons that it is hard to key on one or two guys.

 I think the Colts defensive game plan is very similar to the Saints. They need to get pressure on Brees or else New Orleans will make big plays down the field. Without Freeney at 100%, I think the Colts will have to blitz more than they would like. The Saints offense needs time to operate or at least be as explosive as possible. It’s like a high school math chart, with more time the Saints are more explosive. If the Colts can get pressure (which I don’t think they will consistently get without Freeney) the Saints offense will sputter like it did vs Dallas and Tampa Bay.

I think we are heading straight for an ol’ western shootout. Both offenses are so good and have so many playmakers. This should be a great game with the two best teams in the NFL facing off. Prediction on Friday…

Super Bowl week is here!

Monday, February 1st, 2010

Finally Super Bowl Week is here. Which is a bright spot on my otherwise cynical outlook, which includes the sneaking suspicion that the entire world is run by 5 or 6 mustache-clad gentleman, cackling around a large mahogany table.

 Anyway, The All-Schmoe game is behind us (thank God) and we can look forward to some real football. Both teams fly into Miami today and try get ready for the circus that is sure to ensue. I really think the Colts have the edge as far as preparation goes because they have been there before. Literally, and figuratively. As in been THERE in Miami, for their last Super Bowl, three years ago. They will be much more familiar with how the week will run.  The big story is that Dwight Freeney has a torn ligament in his ankle.

 What does this mean to the Colts?

No one knows how serious the injury is and probably won’t until after the actually game. With that being said, if Freeney can’t play, it will be a serious blow to the Colts defense. Without him, Drew Brees will have more time and with more time = bad things for the Colts. Freeney is so quick off the ball and could really disrupt the rhythm of the Saints offense. I really think that Freeney will try to play so the big question is…How effective will he be? Will he play 15 plays? Will he be at 60%, 70%? We will have to wait and see but I’m guessing with the whole off season to rest, Dwight Freeney, the pride of central NY, will be out there Sunday Night.

What does it mean for Drew Brees, now that arguably the greatest pass rushing threat of the last 5 years is less than perfect?  How, if at all do they adjust their offensive game plan?  More on that, tomorrow.